首页> 外文OA文献 >Alumina-on-alumina ceramic versus metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study
【2h】

Alumina-on-alumina ceramic versus metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene bearings in total hip arthroplasty: a comparative study

机译:全髋关节置换术中氧化铝对氧化铝陶瓷与高度交联金属聚乙烯轴承的比较研究

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

The aim of the study was to evaluate the reliability and durability of alumina-on-alumina ceramic in comparison to metal-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (CoCr/HXLPE) bearing couples. This prospective randomised study involved 150 patients (157 hips). All patients (mean age: 54.7 years) obtained an identical fibre metal midcoat femoral stem and fibre metal-coated acetabular shell. In 78 patients (82 hips) we used alumina, while in 72 patients (75 hips) metal-polyethylene bearing couples were used. During a mean 50.4-month follow-up period (51 ± 8 alumina and 50 ± 8.9 metal-polyethylene) no statistically significant changes in clinical and radiographic parameters were noted between the two groups. There was no ceramic breakage and no need for revision surgery due to the ceramic liner. The alumina bearing couples proved to be as reliable as CoCr/HXLPE.
机译:这项研究的目的是评估与高金属交联聚乙烯(CoCr / HXLPE)轴承对相比的氧化铝对氧化铝陶瓷的可靠性和耐久性。这项前瞻性随机研究涉及150例患者(157髋)。所有患者(平均年龄:54.7岁)均获得了相同的纤维金属中涂层股骨柄和纤维金属涂层的髋臼壳。在78位患者(82髋)中,我们使用了氧化铝,而在72位患者(75髋)中,使用了金属聚乙烯轴承。在平均50.4个月的随访期间(51±±8氧化铝和50±±8.9的金属-聚乙烯),两组之间在临床和放射学参数方面没有统计学上的显着变化。由于采用了陶瓷衬里,因此没有陶瓷损坏,也无需进行翻修手术。氧化铝轴承偶被证明与CoCr / HXLPE一样可靠。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号